Comparison of the Pixel 7 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro in a cinematic video

One of the most distinctive features of big lensesIt’s the amazing bokeh effect you get with conventional cameras. The video’s cinematic appearance is enhanced by the stylistic choice of separating the subject from the background.

Android salad Take a quick look at the cinematic blur created by the Pixel 7 Pro and the iPhone 14 Pro’s Cinematic Mode. Here are the results.

You can refer to our deep dive to learn more about how to use it. cinematic blur effect with google pixelIt works, the principle is very simple. Cinematic video modes work in the same way as portrait mode photos. machine learningAlgorithms are used to give the video content an artificial bokeh effect.

As you might expect, the real time processing requirements for this are higher than those required to take selfies. The results aren’t always as convincing as standard portrait photography. However, with more powerful processors as well as ML-focused chipsets, the results are now much more convincing. Tensor G2 SoC . ChipIt is possible to make the feature more attractive.

Can the best of Apple, Google and Google do convincing work? Go to google drive linkYou can take a closer look at the HD videos.

Tracking shot

A tracking shot is a video in which you follow a moving target. It is also one of the most common shots in smartphone photography. Have you ever taken a video of yourself walking with a Starbucks in hand? This is a tracking shot.

I grabbed a cup for tea and walked to my front porch. Although the Pixel 7 Pro’s video blur implementation appears to be quite normal, a closer inspection reveals a very different story.

You’ll notice artifacts, a halo around the thumb, and the outer wall of my mug. These are the areas where the phone tries to draw a blurry bokeh. The phone artifact called the aura is a constant motion blurring around the edges of the focus areas.

Overall, the results are good, but with bright exposure levels and poor bokeh separation, it’s not a perfect start for the Pixel 7 Pro.

The iPhone 14 Pro has some key differences. First, Apple’s handling of color is quite different. The photos here look almost muted compared to the Pixel 7 Pro. It makes up for the lack of pop with detail and color accuracy.

It’s the difference between day and night, if we go back to the bokeh lesson. There is no halo. The iPhone stays focused on the subject. The bokeh fell was perfectly accented around my cup and hand. The iPhone 14 Pro’s bokeh display is more balanced than the Pixel’s. Overall, however, the iPhone wins this round.

Portrait shots

It’s time for the second shot. Combining a tracking shot and a human subject is one the most difficult situations to achieve accuracy, but it’s also one of the most popular uses of cinematic video.

Exploring Pixel 7 Pro shots on large screens presents the same problems as our first test. The camera has trouble drawing the borders of the blurb on my sunglasses and face. The camera also can’t measure my hair gaps and creates a wider border around me. The Pixel 7 Pro’s wobbly focus detracts from cinematic immersion.

The iPhone 14 Pro allows you to use cinematic mode with standard and telephoto lens. For this shot, we used the standard lens. This image is much wider than the Pixel 7 Pro’s cropped version. The iPhone 14 Pro uses a more natural color rendering and has more detail than the first test. This is evident in the five o’clock shadow and most clearly in the footage.

The iPhone 14 Pro’s syntheticbokeh is not solid if you look closely. It is possible to see some shine around the edges of your face. It does a marginally better job of my hair. It also doesn’t have the focus issues that we saw with the Pixel, making it a clear winner.

Panning shot

Next, we did a simple pan across several hanging garden accessories. The purpose of this test was to determine how well the camera captures focus among complex arrays of papers and floating objects at different distances.

The Pixel 7 Pro fails in this area, there is no doubt about that. Throughout the moving sequence, it constantly shifts in and outside of focus. Even when the camera can focus on the primary object, edge detection is very poor.

You will also notice large sections in the foliage where the Pixel attempts to determine depth precisely. This is a poor look for the Pixel 7 Pro.

The iPhone 14 Pro’s results aren’t perfect. The camera tends to blur the corners of the garden accessory. You can correct this by using a narrower camera. and stopYou can’t use your Pixel to do this before or after you’re done shooting. The iPhone 14 Pro did a better job blurring the background leaves. Another win for iPhone.

Drag focus across multiple objects

To test the ability of the two phones to focus on objects while in motion, we placed them on a table.

While there is a place to make dramatic transitions between subjects in high-motion shots, the Pixel 7 Pro’s wobbly focused clearly distracts from slow-motion shots. We found that the phone struggled to separate its bokeh when dealing layered objects. The phone was also unable to detect the candle holder, and completely ignored it in its artificially generated bokeh.

The iPhone 14 Pro is generally better at creating bokeh drops as we move along a table. The shift in focus is gradual, not as abrupt as the Pixel 7 Pro’s sudden jumps in and out. This simulates a real-world cinematic-style focus draw. Although iPhone may lose focus on the glass candleholder and miss the beautiful plant edges at the edges, the overall results are better.

The Pixel 7 Pro’s cinematic Blur mode is a welcome addition, but our tests show that we are still a generation away from a Pixel catching up or even beating it. This is not just because of blurred bokeh.

The iPhone 14 Pro’s Cinema Mode can record at upto 4K/30fps. This is a significant improvement on the Pixel’s Full HD/24fps. While I’m not fussed about the 24fps resolution, it is still noticeable. You can shoot cinematic video with the regular lens as well as the telephoto lens on the iPhone. Pixel Cinema works only with the main lens.

Finally, unlike the iPhone, the Pixel doesn’t support portrait-style video on the front camera at all — a situation that’s likely to be a common use case among social media enthusiasts and vloggers.

The Pixel 7 Pro is the best choice for cinematic video recording, while the iPhone 14 Pro is the best. In every test scenario, the iPhone outperforms Pixel to varying degrees. Despite its geographical location computational photographyAnd app mixed with machine learning, the Pixel 7 Pro’s cinematic Blur doesn’t get beyond the very basic video-bokeh apps we have seen on SamsungAnd the Huawei phones.

The Pixel’s constant wobbling focus puts it behind the iPhone’s rocky focus. Unwanted edge recognition is often worse than Apple’s. Add to that missing features like 4K Mode and Cinematic Bluring on the front camera and the Pixel 7 Pro will slip further.

Although the addition of the feature is a great start for the Pixel 7 series phone, it will take much more to implement the cinematic mode on the phone to catch up to the competition.